The Minnesota Report: Revised Personnel System | Third Edition
- MMPI®-2 The Minnesota Report™: Revised Personnel System, Third Edition presents in-depth, occupation-specific information with tailored reports for six public safety fields and information to support candidate-selection for high-risk, high-stress positions
Overview
- Qualification level:
- C
- Administration:
- Q-global, Q Local, or paper and pencil.
- Scoring options:
- Q-global™ scoring & reporting; Q Local™ software; hand scoring.
Product Details
A New Norm: The MMPI-3 is now available! Try it now with a free trialThe MMPI®-2 The Minnesota Report™: Reports for Personnel Settings presents in-depth, occupation-specific information—with tailored reports for six public safety fields. Whether you choose the comprehensive Interpretive Report or the Adjustment Rating Report, the Revised Personnel System will assist you in making solid hiring decisions. Users & ApplicationsThe Revised Personnel System reports provide valuable information enabling clinicians to confidently evaluate personality attributes that may contribute to unsafe, irresponsible, or ineffective on-the-job behavior. Tailored reports are available for each of these six public safety areas:
Features & Benefits
|
Training
Getting Started with the Q-global Training SeriesView these brief training modules about Q-global: |
Resources
Helpful Links |
Scoring & Reporting
Revised Personnel Interpretive ReportThe Interpretive Report includes these important elements to help support selection for high-risk, high-stress positions: Narrative section. Developed by noted MMPI-2 test expert James N. Butcher, PhD, the narrative section is tailored to each occupation. Organized to address the questions most relevant in employment selection, the narrative section includes:
More than 100 MMPI-2 scales. The report provides a profile or listing of scores for more than 100 MMPI-2 scales, including validity scales, clinical scales, clinical subscales, content scales, content component scales, and supplementary scales. Nongendered norms. Nongendered T-scores are reported for the clinical and content scales to provide additional comparative information. Profile stability and profile frequency data. The report presents occupation-specific profile stability and profile frequency data based on statistical information from more than 18,000 cases. Comparisons to normative and occupational samples help provide a clearer understanding of the applicant's profile. Addiction potential scales. These scales present incisive information related to alcohol and drug addiction and potential for addiction. All three substance abuse scales (MAC-R, AAS, and APS) are conveniently profiled together. Plus, you select how the information is reported. You can use standard cut-offs or more stringent cut-offs, or you can suppress all information relating to addiction potential—even the scale scores. Work dysfunction items. These items are reported for clinician follow-up in areas that may be significant in understanding an applicant’s work performance. The items compare the applicant’s endorsements to both the normative and personnel samples and have been found to be related to dysfunctional attitudes or negative behavior in various employment situations. Sample Reports
Revised Adjustment Rating ReportThe Adjustment Rating Report provides a convenient, cost-effective option to the Interpretive Report. Instead of providing a comprehensive narrative section, the Adjustment Rating Report presents scores for the following five important work-related dimensions in a one-page summary:
The report also includes:
Sample Reports
Scoring and/or Reporting Options Q-global™ Web-based Administration, Scoring, and Reporting – Enables you to quickly assess and efficiently organize examinee information, generate scores, and produce accurate comprehensive reports all via the Web. Q Local™ Scoring and Reporting Desktop Software - Enables you to score assessments, report results, and store and export data on your computer. Manual Scoring – Allows you to administer and score assessments by hand. |